P&H: Sets Aside Substitution Of Mahant’s Successor; Orders Enquiry Under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a trial court order that had substituted one Gian Parkash as the legal representative of deceased Mahant Gopal Dass in a pending injunction suit concerning Dera property at Village Ralla, Mansa. High Court remitted the matter to the civil court to conduct an enquiry under Order 22 Rule 5 of the Code
P&H: Sets Aside Substitution Of Mahant’s Successor; Orders Enquiry Under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC
punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date:
15 May 2026
Headnotes
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, S.2(11), O.22.R.5 — Substitution of legal representative — When rival claims are raised, Court concerned should conduct an enquiry as envisaged under Order 22 Rule 5 CPC to arrive at conclusion as to who would be the legal representative - Ordering substitution merely on the basis of some Will is not right approach - Impugned order set aside and matter remitted. (Paras 21 and 22) Religious and charitable endowments — Succession to office of Mahant —
Facts of the Case
Quick Info
⚖️ Court
punjab haryana
Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File