P&H: Quashes Chandigarh MBBS merit list for excluding OBC "migrant" candidate

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 21 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Admission -- Admission to MBBS course under the U.T. Chandigarh Pool for session 2026-2027 was governed by prospectus, and respondents could not exclude an otherwise eligible OBC candidate by labelling him as a “migrant” when the prospectus contained no such bar - Revised provisional...

(ii) Words and Phrases -- Rules of the game -- Means thereby criteria for selection, cannot be modified in middle or after process of selection has begun - Prospectus constitutes declared norm by which eligibility, scrutiny, preparation of merit and admission have to be regulated,...

(iii) Admission -- Clause A-3 of the prospectus required candidates for U.T. Chandigarh Pool seats to satisfy the prescribed eligibility criteria, and Clause A-7 required an OBC candidate to submit the prescribed OBC certificate issued by the competent authority - There was no requirement that...

(iv) Admission -- Prospectus - Government instructions dated 08.04.1994 could not be read into prospectus, as doing so would amount to modifying prospectus and introducing new eligibility condition after admission process had commenced - Such a condition could be incorporated only for future academic sessions...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Quashes Chandigarh MBBS merit list for excluding OBC "migrant" candidate

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a revised merit list for MBBS admissions in Chandigarh after finding that the authorities could not deny an OBC candidate admission merely because his certificate described him as a “migrant”. The court said the admission prospectus did not contain any such disqualification.

The case involved five connected writ petitions concerning MBBS admissions to the U.T. Chandigarh Pool for the 2026-2027 session. The lead petitioner, Nitin Yadav, said he belonged to the Yadav caste, which is recognised as OBC in Chandigarh, had studied in Chandigarh, and had cleared NEET (UG) 2026 under...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File