P&H: Refuses to quash wildlife complaint over alleged illegal keeping of monkey

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 24 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Ss.9, 2(16)(b), 39, 51, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528, — Quashing of complaint — Complaint alleging illegal keeping and display of a Rhesus Macaque, protected wild animal under Schedule II, Part I of the Act, 1972 —...

(iii) Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Ss.9, 2(16)(b), 39, 51, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528, — Quashing of complaint — Absence of recovery of alleged animal — Fact that alleged monkey was not recovered during inspections was only a circumstance to be considered...

(iv) Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972, Ss.9, 2(16)(b), 39, 51, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528, — Quashing of complaint — Whether petitioner was in possession or control of alleged animal, whether videos related to same animal and whether material collected by Department established...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to quash wildlife complaint over alleged illegal keeping of monkey

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to quash criminal proceedings against a Chandigarh tattoo studio owner accused of illegally keeping and displaying a Rhesus Macaque, a protected wild animal under the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The petition was filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking quashing of Complaint No. NACT-5859-2020 and all consequential proceedings. The complainant department said it had received information from PETA India about the alleged presence of the monkey at Kamz Inkzone in Sector 35-C, Chandigarh.

According to the complaint, the Wildlife Enforcement Team inspected the premises twice. Although...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File