P&H: Denies Anticipatory Bail in Alleged ₹1.70 Crore Textile Goods Fraud

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 13 Oct 2026
Headnotes

(1) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.482 — Anticipatory bail — The petitioner was alleged to have fraudulently procured clothing and fabric worth Rs 1,70,61,717 from complainant-company against post-dated cheques of Rs 66,60,000, which were dishonoured after payment was stopped, and thereafter to have withdrawn...

(2) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.482 — Anticipatory bail — Petitioner’s pleas, including false implication, were matters to be adjudicated on basis of evidence during trial and could not be conclusively determined at stage of considering prayer for anticipatory bail. (Para 6.1)

(3) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.482 — Anticipatory bail — Relevant considerations — While considering plea for anticipatory bail, Court has to equilibrate between safeguarding individual rights and protecting societal interests, and ought to reckon with magnitude and nature of offence, role attributed to...

(4) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 482 — Anticipatory bail — Custodial interrogation — There was no material on record to hold that prima facie case was not made out against petitioner, and material and preliminary investigation appeared to establish reasonable basis for accusations...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Denies Anticipatory Bail in Alleged ₹1.70 Crore Textile Goods Fraud

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused anticipatory bail to Ummed Singh in a case alleging that a group fraudulently obtained textile goods worth about ₹1.70 crore from a company and later sold them without paying the suppliers. Justice Sumeet Goel held that the allegations and material available at this stage did not justify granting the pre-arrest protection.

The FIR was registered on a complaint by the director of Shivam Devansh Fab Private Limited. The prosecution alleged that the accused obtained clothing and fabric worth ₹1,70,61,717 against post-dated cheques totalling ₹66.60 lakh. The cheques were later dishonoured after payment...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File