P&H: No recovery alone cannot justify denying anticipatory bail

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 15 Oct 2026
Headnotes

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.482(2) — Anticipatory bail — Allegations concerning an allegedly fabricated demarcation report — Petitioner had joined investigation — Benefit of anticipatory bail could not be denied merely because no recovery had been effected — Interim anticipatory bail made absolute. (Paras...


Facts of the Case

P&H: No recovery alone cannot justify denying anticipatory bail

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has made interim anticipatory bail absolute for a petitioner accused in a case involving an allegedly forged land demarcation report. Justice Shalini Singh Nagpal held that the benefit of anticipatory bail could not be denied merely because no recovery had been made.

The FIR alleged that the accused, in collusion with a revenue official, procured a false spot report concerning possession of land and relied on it in civil proceedings to defraud the complainant and his family. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail, while the State opposed the plea, saying he had not cooperated with...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File