P&H: Independent Property Claim Does Not Entitle Person To Join Landlord-Tenant Eviction Case

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 15 Oct 2026
Headnotes

(i) Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.1.R.10, East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, S.13 — Impleadment of necessary parties — Person can be impleaded u/O.1.R.10 CPC if presence is necessary for effective adjudication of questions involved in proceedings — Petitioner claims independent right in disputed shop...

(ii) East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, S.13, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, O.1.R.10 — Impleadment in eviction proceedings — Allegation that landlord and tenant are acting in connivance with each other, by itself, does not establish that the petitioner is a necessary or proper...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Independent Property Claim Does Not Entitle Person To Join Landlord-Tenant Eviction Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has upheld an order refusing to add a third party to an eviction case between a landlord and a tenant. Justice Mandeep Pannu ruled that a person claiming independent ownership rights cannot insist on joining rent proceedings merely because the property is also the subject of a separate civil suit.

The petitioner said the landlord and tenant were acting in collusion to defeat his rights in a disputed shop. He claimed independent rights in the property and had filed a civil suit seeking partition, declaration, possession and mandatory injunction. He argued that his presence...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File