P&H: Refuses to quash summoning of police officials in custodial death case

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 27 Jul 2026
Headnotes

(i) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Ss.176, 197 — Scope of interference at stage of summoning — At stage of issuance of process, Court is only required to examine whether material available on record discloses sufficient grounds for proceeding against accused — Meticulous appreciation of the...

(ii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.176 — Judicial enquiry into custodial death — Enquiry conducted u/s.176 of Code is essentially intended to ascertain circumstances in which custodial death has occurred — Such an enquiry cannot be equated with regular criminal trial where witnesses are subjected...

(iii) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, S.176, 197, 482 — Private complaint regarding custodial death — Preliminary evidence and particularly testimony of witness, coupled with admitted fact that deceased died while in police custody, constitute sufficient material to justify issuance of process — Truthfulness of...

(iv) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.197 — Sanction for prosecution — Custodial death — Sanction for prosecution was not liable to be accepted at the stage of quashing — Allegations in complaint were of illegal detention, assault, criminal intimidation and denial of timely medical assistance...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to quash summoning of police officials in custodial death case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to interfere with criminal proceedings against three police officials in a custodial death case, holding that the material on record was enough to justify summoning them for trial.

The case arose from a complaint filed by Jagdish, father of deceased Sandeep, who alleged that his son was illegally detained by police officials, beaten inside a police post, deprived of his mobile phone and cash, and denied timely medical help despite repeated requests from companions. Sandeep later died after complaining of chest pain.

The police officials approached the High Court under Section 482...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File