P&H: Sony India’s challenge to Chandigarh VAT notification is academic

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 02 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, S.8(3) — Notification dated 27.06.2006 — Concessional rate of tax — Petitioner claimed Digital Still Image Cameras (DSC) formed part of the expression “IT Products” and, therefore, were covered by the unamended entry as well as the substituted entry —...

(ii) Punjab Value Added Tax Act, 2005, S.8(3) — Notification dated 27.06.2006 — Concessional rate of tax — Assessment orders — Since lead petition had been disposed of, petitioner-Company was advised to challenge assessment orders by filing appeals in accordance with law — All questions were left...

(iv) Limitation — Filing of appeal against assessment order — The Court directed that if such appeals were instituted within 30 days, they would be entertained without objection as to limitation. Page 8, Para 10


Facts of the Case

P&H: Sony India’s challenge to Chandigarh VAT notification is academic

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has disposed of writ petitions filed by Sony India Private Limited challenging a Chandigarh VAT notification and related assessment orders. The company had argued that its Digital Still Image Cameras should be taxed at the concessional rate applicable to “IT products” under the Punjab VAT Act, 2005 as applicable to Chandigarh.

Sony India said the Administrator of UT Chandigarh had no jurisdiction to issue the notification dated 27 June 2006 under Section 8(3) of the Act. It also argued that the amendment to Serial No. 60 of Schedule-B was arbitrary and beyond authority.

The...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File