P&H: Rejects Workman’s Claim Filed After 19 Years Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act as inordinate delay

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 31 Aug 2026
Headnotes

(i) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2) — Computation of benefits — Claim based on award passed in 1991 — Application filed in 2010 after almost 19 years — There is no statutory period of limitation provided, claim which is over-stale or suffers from inordinate...

(ii) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33-C(2) — Delay and laches — Subsequent civil suit challenging office order dated 11.03.1999 did not save limitation, as the application was not filed on basis of that office order but on basis of the award dated 14.11.1991. (Para...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Rejects Workman’s Claim Filed After 19 Years Under Section 33-C(2) of Industrial Disputes Act as inordinate delay

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a Letters Patent Appeal filed by a workman seeking benefits under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, holding that the claim was stale and barred by delay and laches.

The appellant, Hanuman, had been working as a Clerk with Fazilka Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. His services were terminated in 1979, and after a labour dispute, the Labour Court in 1991 ordered his reinstatement with continuity of service and back wages from the date of demand notice.

Although he was reinstated in 1996, the workman later sought promotion-related benefits and refixation...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File