P&H: Rejects PRTC Driver’s Reinstatement Plea Over Six-Year Delay

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 13 Oct 2026
Headnotes

Writ — Delay and laches — Writ petition challenging rejection of claim for reinstatement, filed more than six years after petitioner withdrew an earlier writ petition with liberty to pursue an appeal, was dismissed where no satisfactory explanation for the intervening inaction was furnished. (Paras...

Writ — Alternative remedy — Liberty granted on withdrawal of an earlier writ petition to avail an alternative remedy does not assure litigant that litigant may approach Court at any future time irrespective of inaction, and does not dispense with requirement of approaching Court within...

Write — Delay of 6 years — Earlier writ petition was withdrawn with liberty to avail remedy of appeal — Subsequent realisation that particular remedy is unavailable does not satisfactorily explain prolonged inaction or revive a stale claim. (Paras 7 and 8)


Facts of the Case

P&H: Rejects PRTC Driver’s Reinstatement Plea Over Six-Year Delay

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a former Punjab Roadways Transport Corporation (PRTC) driver’s plea seeking reinstatement, holding that he approached the Court more than six years after withdrawing an earlier case and had not adequately explained the delay. Justice Namit Kumar said the delay disentitled him to discretionary relief under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The driver was dismissed in 2006 after being convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act. The High Court acquitted him in 2013, giving him the benefit of doubt. He later sought reinstatement, but the Corporation rejected his claim. In 2019,...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File