P&H: Refuses to Set Six-Month Deadline for Haryana Criminal Trial

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 08 Oct 2026
Headnotes

(i) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.528 — Time-bound conclusion — A direction prescribing rigid time-frame for conclusion of trial ought not to be issued mechanically, particularly where record does not disclose any manifest or attributable failure on part of Trial Court resulting in avoidable...

(ii) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.528 — Time-bound conclusion — Petitioner remained absent from proceedings for substantial period while abroad — No exceptional ground made out for peremptory direction fixing time for conclusion of trial — Trial Court to endeavour to proceed without avoidable...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to Set Six-Month Deadline for Haryana Criminal Trial

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a plea by Lovenish alias Kalu seeking a direction for the trial court to conclude his criminal trial within six months. Justice Virinder Aggarwal held that the record did not justify imposing a fixed deadline.

The case arises from a 2022 FIR registered at Ambala Cantt police station under provisions of the Indian Penal Code relating to, among other offences, robbery and attempted murder. The petitioner said that only two of the 21 prosecution witnesses had been examined and that the delay was affecting his ability to return to Canada for work...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File