P&H: Allows Four Witnesses to Be Examined After Prosecution Evidence Was Closed

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 02 Nov 2026
Headnotes

(i) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.311 — Order closing prosecution evidence not challenged — Exercise of recalling or examination of witnesses power is not review of order of closure. (Paras 6 and 7)

(ii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.311 — Recall or examination of witnesses — Rash and negligence driving — Statements of two alleged eyewitnesses identifying accused and describing occurrence, mechanical inspection report and evidence of investigating officer appeared essential to the just decision of case —...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Allows Four Witnesses to Be Examined After Prosecution Evidence Was Closed

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a trial court order refusing to examine four prosecution witnesses in a 2019 road-death case. Justice Manisha Batra held that the closure of prosecution evidence does not, by itself, prevent a court from allowing further evidence when it appears necessary for a just decision.

The case arose from an FIR alleging that an Innova driven rashly and negligently ran over Harpal Singh’s mother, Anguri Devi, outside her home. The prosecution had listed two alleged eyewitnesses, a police official who prepared the vehicle’s mechanical inspection report, and the investigating officer. They were...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File