P&H : Upholds Decree Against HUDA’s Enhanced Compensation; Orders Recalculation Across All Allottees, Refund With 9% Interest High Court dismissed HUDA’s second appeal challenging concurrent decrees that set aside an enhanced compensation demand raised on a residential allottee in Karnal. Justice affirmed that such compensation must be spread proportionately across the entire developed sector, including commercial areas, and cannot be loaded solely on residential plot-holders. The case arose from a 1990 demand notice issued to the plaintiff,
P&H : Upholds Decree Against HUDA’s Enhanced Compensation; Orders Recalculation Across All Allottees, Refund With 9% Interest
punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date:
04 May 2026
Headnotes
Haryana Urban Development (Disposal of Land and Buildings) Regulations, 1978, Reguls.2(b), 10 - Demand notice - Enhanced compensation - Enhanced compensation is required to be distributed proportionately over the entire developed area of scheme including residential and commercial components exclusion of commercial areas and sector roads - Loading the burden only on residential allottees is inconsistent with law and results in arbitrary and discriminatory levy - Demand notice held, unsustainable. (Paras 13 & 14) Haryana Urban Development Authority Act,
Facts of the Case
Quick Info
⚖️ Court
punjab haryana
Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File