P&H: Sets Aside Registered Will, Says Registration Alone Doesn’t Prove Genuineness, Grants Estate To Sister’s Heirs

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 13 May 2026
Headnotes

Indian Succession Act, 1925, S.63(c), Evidence Act, 1872, Ss.68, 69, 70 — Will — Even in case of registered Will, propounder is required to satisfy the judicial conscience of Court and dispel suspicious circumstances, if any surrounding Will - Testator filed suit against mother of...

Will — Recital in rival Will — A recital in plaintiffs 1975 Will purporting to cancel the earlier 1972 Will does not, by itself, prove due execution and attestation of the earlier Will - Testator died within 25 days of alleged execution of Will propounded by...

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22 — Non‑impleadment objection — Transferees pendente lite who were already on record in LRs capacity and were heard at final arguments need not be separately impleaded again. (Paras 27 and 28)

Succession — Intestate succession — With both rival Will 1972 and Will 1975, found invalid and surrounded by suspicious circumstances, estate devolves intestate - Plaintiffs, being sons and grandsons of the testator’s sister, succeed. (Para 31)


Facts of the Case

P&H: Sets Aside Registered Will, Says Registration Alone Doesn’t Prove Genuineness, Grants Estate To Sister’s Heirs

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed a 1994 second appeal in a family property dispute, ruling that a registered Will is not automatically valid unless the propounder proves due execution and dispels suspicious circumstances. Both rival Wills set up by the parties were invalid, and the estate of the deceased, Ralla Singh, would devolve on his sister’s sons and grandsons (the plaintiffs).

The plaintiffs sued for joint possession of agricultural land, asserting a 1975 Will in their favour. The defendants relied on an earlier registered Will of 1972 in favour of defendant No.1. The trial court and first...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File