P&H: Rejects Plea Of Oral Family Settlement And “Partial Partition”; Restores Trial Decree Granting Partition The Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed two second appeals and restored a trial court decree directing partition of a joint residential property, setting aside the lower appellate court’s dismissal. The dispute concerns property that originally belonged to Jora Singh and later fell to the share of his son Ami Lal. Daya Ram, claiming a 1/16th share as a
P&H: Rejects Plea Of Oral Family Settlement And “Partial Partition”; Restores Trial Decree Granting Partition
punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date:
18 May 2026
Headnotes
Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.158(2) — Partition of joint property — Jurisdiction — Absence of any evidence to prove existence of joint gair-mumkin land among parties, suit can not be held to be bad for partial partition - Even appellant admitted that land was joint, it was incumbent upon defendants to prove that same is uncultivable land and same cannot be partitioned by revenue authorities. (Para 6) Punjab Land Revenue Act, 1887, S.158(2) —
Facts of the Case
Quick Info
⚖️ Court
punjab haryana
Recently Added
Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File