P&H: Permanent Lok Adalat - Lacked Monetary Jurisdiction - Sets Aside Award

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 19 May 2026
Headnotes

Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, S. 22C(1) (second proviso) — Permanent Lok Adalat — Monetary jurisdiction — At time of passing imuged order monetray jurisdiction was Rs.1 Crore - Expression used in proviso is "value of the property in dispute” and not “amount involved in dispute” or...

Words and Phrases — “Value of the property in dispute” — The phrase in second proviso of S22C(1) of Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, denotes value of the very property forming the subject-matter of dispute and is distinct from “amount involved in dispute” or “value of...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Permanent Lok Adalat - Lacked Monetary Jurisdiction - Sets Aside Award 

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside a Permanent Lok Adalat (PLA) award in a dispute arising from the auction of a commercial plot in Hisar, holding that the PLA lacked monetary jurisdiction because the value of the property in dispute exceeded the statutory limit of Rs.1 crore. 

The case stemmed from a 2011 auction where Amar Singh and others were allotted Plot No. 29 in Phase‑I, Vyapar and Vyavsay Kunj Pariyojna, Hisar, for Rs.1.93 crore. After depositing 25% and paying installments, they were offered possession in July 2016. Claiming that development work was incomplete, they approached the...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File