P&H: Dismisses Plea To Direct FIR Over Allegedly Fabricated Complaint; Says Section 175(3) BNSS Power Is Discretionary

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 21 May 2026
Headnotes

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 175(3) — Direction for registration of FIR — Scope — The Jurisdiction u/s.175(3) is discretionary and is to be exercised where the material placed discloses commission of cognizable offence requiring police investigation and where such investigation cannot effectively proceed through the...

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528 — Inherent jurisdiction — Interference with concurrent orders refusing directions under Section 175(3) BNSS — Interference under inherent jurisdiction would be warranted only where the orders suffer from patent illegality or result in miscarriage of justice - No such circumstance...

Criminal Trial — Mere suspicion, inferences from absence of receipt/diary details or alleged procedural irregularities do not constitute independent prima facie material to direct criminal investigation for fabrication, forgery or misuse of official position. (Para 8)

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Ss.175(3), 528 — Before directing registration of FIR, Court must be satisfied that the allegations disclose more than a speculative or inferential accusation and that criminal machinery is not being invoked to settle collateral disputes - Contention that investigation should be ordered...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Dismisses Plea To Direct FIR Over Allegedly Fabricated Complaint; Says Section 175(3) BNSS Power Is Discretionary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a petition seeking directions to register an FIR over an allegedly fabricated complaint that was said to have affected an Income Tax Inspector’s service record. Justice Manisha Batra held that the Magistrate’s power under Section 175(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) is discretionary and must be invoked only when prima facie material discloses a cognizable offence warranting police investigation.

The petitioner, Vipin Kumar, appearing in person, challenged orders of the Judicial Magistrate First Class and the Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, which had refused his plea under Section 175(3) BNSS for...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File