P&H: Grants Bail To Accused Not Named In FIR; Notes Subsequent Implication Based Only On Co-Accused Disclosure

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 22 May 2026
Headnotes
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, S.14-A(2), Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.483, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sa.302, 323, 325, 147, 148, 149, 506, 201 — Bail — Accused not named in FIR or initial version, implication rested only on disclosure of co-accused and on an improved supplementary statement — Deceased’s last disclosure/dying declaration did not name appellant and persons so named were found innocent during investigation — Investigation concluded, custody

Login to read full Headnotes

Login

Facts of the Case
P&H: Grants Bail To Accused Not Named In FIR; Notes Subsequent Implication Based Only On Co-Accused Disclosure The Punjab and Haryana High Court has granted regular bail to an accused in a murder case invoking the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, noting that he was not named in the FIR or the deceased’s last disclosure, and that his implication surfaced only through a co-accused’s disclosure and later supplementary statements. Hearing an appeal under Section 14-A(2)

Login to unlock full judgment

Unlock Now
Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File