P&H: Quashes Cheque Bounce Case For Notice Sent Beyond 30 Days, as Compliance of S.138(b) is Substantive Precondition.

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 22 May 2026
Headnotes

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.138, 142, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482,  — Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of complaint - Where complainant’s own averments disclose that statutory notice u/s 138(b) of N.I.  Act was issued beyond thirty days from receipt of information of dishonour, continuation of proceedings would be...

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — Dishonour of cheque - Issuance of a written demand notice within thirty days from the date of receipt of bank’s information of dishonour is a substantive statutory precondition and not a mere procedural formality and unless fulfilled offence u/s 138 of N.I....

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — Dishonour of cheque - Demand notice - Limitation - On the complainant’s own showing, information regarding dishonour was received on 29.07.2017 excluding that date, limitation commenced on 30.07.2017 and expired on 28.08.2017 - Notice issued on 29.08.2017 was beyond...

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482, ​ — Dishonour of cheque - Quashing of complaint -  Objection limited to admitted dates and statutory precondition of issuing notice within limitation is a pure question of law discernible from complaint itself and can be...

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.138, 139, 118 — Dishonour of cheque - Presumption — Presumptions as to consideration and issuance do not arise for decision when complaint itself discloses non-fulfilment of mandatory precondition u/s 138(b) of the Act, relegation to trial would serve no useful purpose. (Para 8)

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482 - Quashing of proceedings - Where admitted pleadings demonstrate failure to satisfy a mandatory statutory requirement, continuation of criminal proceedings would be an empty formality and inherent powers are to be invoked to secure ends of justice. (Para 12) 

 


Facts of the Case

P&H: Quashes Cheque Bounce Case For Notice Sent Beyond 30 Days, as Compliance of S.138(b) is Substantive Precondition.

High Court has quashed a cheque dishonour complaint after finding that the statutory demand notice was issued beyond the 30-day period mandated under Section 138(b) of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Court allowed a petition under Section 482 CrPC  and set aside the summoning order.

The complaint alleged that he had advanced Rs. 4 lakh to the petitioner and received a cheque that was dishonoured. The cheque, when re-presented, was again returned with remarks “funds insufficient and dormant account.” The complainant then issued a legal notice.

The petitioner argued that the notice was sent on the 31st day from the date of receipt...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File