P&H: Grants bail in NDPS case To Man Accused Of Smuggling 3.166 Kg of Heroine using drones from across the border.

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 22 May 2026
Headnotes

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.483, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Ss.21(c), 29, 37 - Bail - Contraband - Commercial quantity — Prolonged incarceration and delay in trial — Court applied the mandate of S.436-A Cr.P.C. and Art.21 of Constitution to relax the rigours...

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Ss.42, 50 -- Contraband - Bail - Non-compliance of provisions of Ss.42, 50 of the Act was treated as a relevant factor indicating a possibility of accused not being found guilty at final adjudication, thus weighing in favour...

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.483, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Ss.37, 21(c), 29, 37 - Bail - Contraband - Due to delay in trial fundamental right of speedy trial, guaranteed to petitioner is being violated -Thus, rigors of S.37 of NDPS Act can...

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.483, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Ss.37, 21(c), 29, 37 - Bail - Contraband -Investigation complete, a large number of prosecution witnesses yet to be examined and detention not serving any purpose — Court affirmed that continued incarceration of...

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.483 - Bail - Consideration of bail distinct from merits of trial — Court reiterated that bail adjudication is not punitive and cannot be conflated with a possible adjudication at trial, an ultimate acquittal after continued custody would result in grave...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Grants bail in NDPS case To Man Accused Of Smuggling 3.166 Kg of Heroine using drones from across the border.

High Court has granted bail to accused in an NDPS case alleging heroin smuggling using drones from across the border. Court allowed the first bail petition under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), noting prolonged incarceration and delay in trial.

The case arises from FIR under Sections 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act and Sections 10–12 of the Aircraft Act, Police claimed a yellow packet containing 3.166 kg heroin was recovered from the petitioner after a chase, while two others allegedly carried a drone.

The defence argued false implication, highlighting alleged non-compliance with mandatory provisions of Sections 42 and 50 of the NDPS Act, more than two years and nineteen days of custody, and no criminal antecedents at the time of the FIR. The State opposed bail, citing commercial quantity and the embargo under Section 37 NDPS, and termed the recovery...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File