P&H: Declines State’s Plea To Appeal Acquittal In POCSO Case, Says FSL and DNA Alone Can’t Establish Guilt without corroborative ocular evidence

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 22 May 2026
Headnotes

Indian Evidence Act, 1872, S.45, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, S.6 — DNA/FSL evidence — Value and limits — DNA match on the prosecutrix’s apparel and swabs with the accused’s DNA - Nothing incriminating had been deposed against accused by prosecutrix and father - Without corroborative ocular...

Evidence Act, 1872, Ss.154, 155, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 164 — Hostile witnesses and retracted statement — Prosecutrix and her father did not support the prosecution, did not identify the accused, and the prosecutrix disowned her Section 164 CrPC statement, cross-examination yielded nothing incriminating...

Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, S.6, Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Section 35  — Proof of age — Entry in school register regarding date of birth, without proving the source or the person who made the entry or the foundational document, has no probative value;...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Declines State’s Plea To Appeal Acquittal In POCSO Case, Says FSL and DNA Alone Can’t Establish Guilt without corroborative ocular evidence

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused the State of Haryana’s request for leave to appeal against the acquittal of a man accused of rape under the IPC and aggravated penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act. It was held that positive DNA report, without supporting evidence, cannot by itself establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State had argued that forensic and DNA reports conclusively proved the accused’s involvement, pointing to semen detected on the prosecutrix’s clothing and slides, and a DNA profile that matched the accused. It also contended that school records showed the prosecutrix was a minor,...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File