P&H: Suit for damages; Acquittal or discharge Alone Not Enough To Claim Damages For Malicious Prosecution; Civil Court has to conduct an independent enquiry.
High Court has allowed a second appeal and set aside concurrent decrees that had awarded Rs 80,000 as token damages in a suit alleging malicious prosecution based on a complaint made to Vigilance Bureau.
Plaintiff had sued for Rs 10 lakh, alleging that complaint to Vigilance Bureau contained false and scandalous allegations about his assets and was intended to defame him.
The Trial Court awarded Rs 80,000 as token damages for mental agony, which the First Appellate Court affirmed. In second appeal, Court examined the legal requirements for the tort of malicious prosecution.
Court reiterated that a plaintiff must prove two essential...