P&H: Quashes Complusory Retirement of Judicial Officer, Says Unsubstantiated Remarks Could Not Ruin Clean Career

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 26 May 2026
Headnotes

Service — Compulsory retirement — An order retiring a judicial officer prematurely at the age of 50 years cannot be sustained where officer’s ACRs for about 19 years were consistently Satisfactory, Good or Very Good, no written complaint was received during relevant period and departmental inquiry initiated on...

Service — Compulsory retirement — Annual Confidential Report — Adverse entry — An adverse grading of “C Integrity doubtful” recorded for only five months of appraisal year, without any verified complaint, without waiting for outcome of appeal or inquiry and against backdrop of an otherwise clean service record was...

--------------------------------

 


Facts of the Case

P&H: Quashes Complusory Retirement of Judicial Officer, Says Unsubstantiated Remarks Could Not Ruin Clean Career

High Court has set aside the premature retirement of a judicial officer who was sent out of service at the age of 50 on the basis of a single adverse ACR grading. The court said the decision was unfair and could not stand when the officer’s long service record was largely clean and no written complaint had been received against him during the relevant period.

The petitioner challenged orders by which he was compulsorily retired in public interest. He argued that his Annual Confidential Reports had consistently shown satisfactory or good performance for nearly 19 years, and that the adverse remark...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File