P&H: Refuses to Summon Complainant’s Financial Records i.e ITR and Bank statements etc in Section 138 Case, Says Revision Court Cannot Interfere in Trial Court’s Discretion

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 21 Jul 2026
Headnotes

(i) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.118, 138, 139, Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.94 — Dishnour of Cheque — Summoning of complainant’s financial records — Relevance — Whether complainant possessed sufficient means to advance alleged amount is a matter of evidence to be appreciated during...

(ii) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.94 — Summoning of documents — Scope — Provision empowers Criminal Court to summon any document or thing necessary or desirable for investigation, inquiry, trial or other proceedings, but it does not confer an unfettered right upon an accused...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to Summon Complainant’s Financial Records i.e ITR and Bank statements etc in Section 138 Case, Says Revision Court Cannot Interfere in Trial Court’s Discretion

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Pritpal Singh in a cheque bounce case, upholding the trial court’s refusal to summon the complainant’s income tax returns, bank statements and other financial documents.

The case arose from a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act pending before the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mohali. During defence evidence, the accused sought production of several documents from the complainant, saying they were necessary to challenge the complainant’s version and rebut the statutory presumptions under Sections 118 and 139 of the Act.

The accused argued that...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File