P&H: Refuses to Quash FIR in Land Dispute, Says Civil Proceedings Do Not Bar Criminal Case

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 27 Jul 2026
Headnotes

(i) Civil dispute and criminal prosecution — Mere pendency of civil and revenue proceedings does not render criminal proceedings liable to be quashed where the FIR independently discloses the ingredients of cognizable offences. The existence of a civil dispute is not an absolute bar to...

(ii) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 528, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 447, 34, 379, 427 — Quashing of FIR — Criminal trespass, theft and mischief — FIR specifically alleged forcible entry into disputed land, harvesting and removal of standing wheat crop, damage to the remaining crop...

(iii) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, S.528 — Quashing of FIR— Disputed questions of fact — Pleas of ownership, co-ownership, possession and the effect of civil and revenue orders involve disputed questions of fact and cannot be conclusively determined in inherent jurisdiction - Such defences are...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to Quash FIR in Land Dispute, Says Civil Proceedings Do Not Bar Criminal Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to quash an FIR arising out of a dispute over agricultural land in Amritsar, holding that the allegations in the complaint prima facie disclosed cognizable offences and could not be brushed aside at the threshold.

The petition was filed by Mandeep Singh @ Manna and another under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeking quashing of FIR No. 284 dated 25 October 2022. The FIR had been registered for criminal trespass and related offences, and later sections of theft and mischief were added. The complainant alleged that the petitioners and their...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File