P&H: Refuses to Quash 406 IPC FIR in NRI Matrimonial-Property Dispute, Says Settlement Abroad Cannot Wash Away Prima Facie Breach of Trust Case

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 10 Aug 2026
Headnotes

(i) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss.405 and 406 — Criminal breach of trust — Essential ingredients are entrustment of property or dominion over property, dishonest misappropriation or conversion to own use, or use or disposal in violation of law or contract, and such misappropriation or...

(iii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482 — Quashing of FIR — Matrimonial settlement and criminal proceedings — Plea that matrimonial dispute had been settled before foreign court and that respondent had accepted US $60,000 towards full and final settlement did not warrant quashing, as the...

(iii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, S.406 — Quashing of FIR — Allegations that respondent transferred US $42,000 and US $37,000 for investment in proposed Gas Station, that petitioner withdrew entire amount, did not create promised partnership, inducted his own father...

(iv) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, S.482 — Quashing of FIR — Civil and criminal remedies — Merely because  transaction has civil consequences does not exclude criminal liability if factual allegations satisfy ingredients of  penal offence — Existence of civil remedy or matrimonial settlement is not...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to Quash 406 IPC FIR in NRI Matrimonial-Property Dispute, Says Settlement Abroad Cannot Wash Away Prima Facie Breach of Trust Case

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has refused to quash an FIR against a man accused of criminal breach of trust in an NRI matrimonial dispute, holding that the allegations and investigation material disclosed a prima facie offence under Section 406 of the IPC.

The petition was filed by Urvinderpal Singh, who sought quashing of FIR No. 8 dated 7 September 2018 registered at Police Station NRI, Jalandhar. The complaint was lodged by the father of his wife, alleging that after the marriage, the petitioner and his family induced the complainant to transfer money for a proposed business venture in...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File