P&H: Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Refuses to Enhance Compensation

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 21 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.118, 138 and 139 — Dishonour of cheque — Presumption — Once accused admits his signatures on cheque, an initial presumption arises in favour of complainant that cheque was issued for discharge of a legally enforceable debt or liability —...

(ii) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.138, 118 and 139 — Dishonour of cheque — Account closed and loss plea — Petitioner’s plea that cheques were lost was not accepted — Account had already been closed on borrower’s request before alleged loss report, and petitioner failed...

(iii) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — Conviction and sentence — Quantum of compensation — Loaned amount of Rs. 20 lakhs, cheques worth Rs. 50 lakhs were dishonoured and compensation of Rs. 60 lakhs was awarded — Compensation awarded was adequate in the attending facts...

 


Facts of the Case

P&H: Upholds Conviction in Cheque Bounce Case, Refuses to Enhance Compensation

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed two cross-revisions arising out of a cheque dishonour case, upholding the conviction of the accused and also rejecting the complainant’s plea for enhancement of compensation.

The dispute involved a long-standing business and family relationship between the parties. The complainant alleged that he had advanced Rs. 20 lakh to the accused for business purposes, and that the amount, along with interest, later swelled to Rs. 50 lakh. According to him, the accused first issued security cheques and later replaced them with five cheques of Rs. 10 lakh each, which were dishonoured when presented.

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File