P&H: Acquits man in robbery attempt case, finds prosecution story improbable and sanction under Arms Act defective

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 23 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Indian Penal Code, 1860, Ss. 398 and 401, Arms Act, 1959, S. 25 — Appeal against conviction — Attempt to commit robbery and possession of firearm — Evidence adduced by prosecution with regard to alleged involvement of appellant in commission of offence was too deficient,...

(ii) Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Ss. 173, 313 — Appreciation of evidence — Credibility of -- Prosecution case found improbable — Failure of the Investigating Agency to trace out and prosecute the third person, the absence of independent witnesses at a public place, and the inconsistent...

(iii) Arms Act, 1959, Section 25 — Sanction for prosecution — Defective sanction — The weapon was not produced before the District Magistrate at the time of seeking sanction — The sanctioning authority was therefore not in a position to assess whether valid grounds existed for...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Acquits man in robbery attempt case, finds prosecution story improbable and sanction under Arms Act defective

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the conviction of Satender in a case involving allegations of attempt to commit robbery and possession of an illegal firearm. Justice Surya Partap Singh allowed the appeal and acquitted the appellant, holding that the prosecution evidence was too weak, inconsistent and improbable to sustain the conviction.

The case arose from an FIR registered in 2003 at Police Station City Dadri, Bhiwani, under Sections 398 and 401 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25 of the Arms Act. The prosecution claimed that police, acting on a tip-off, intercepted three persons who...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File