P&H: Upholds 20% Disability Pension for Ex-Army Personnel Despite Medical Board assessed disability below 20%.

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 12 Oct 2026
Headnotes

Armed service — Disability pension — Where an Armed Forces employee was medically examined at time of selection and was not found suffering from disease on the basis of which petitioner was later discharged, employee is entitled to benefit of presumption that disability was contracted during service...

Armed service — Disability pension — Disability assessed below 20% — Any injury which leads to an Army personnel being discharged or invalidated out of service, if assessed at less than 20% has to be treated as a minimum of 20% for the purpose of grant of disability pension....

Armed service — Disability pension — Armed Forces personnel is entitled to benefit of rounding off of disability pension if suffering from disability attributable to or aggravated by military service, irrespective of whether personnel was invalidated out of service, retired on superannuation or completed tenure of...

Armed service — Disability pension — Respondent was medically fit at enrolment and developed disability after more than 16 years of service — In absence of cogent evidence or detailed medical material showing that disability was not attributable to military service, disability had to be...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Upholds 20% Disability Pension for Ex-Army Personnel Despite Medical Board assessed disability below 20%.

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed the Union of India’s challenge to an Armed Forces Tribunal order granting an ex-Army personnel disability pension at the rate of 50%, with arrears from June 25, 2014. The Tribunal had allowed the benefit despite a Medical Board assessing his disability at 11–14% and finding it neither attributable to nor aggravated by military service.

The Union argued that the disability had been assessed below 20%, which it said was a condition for receiving disability pension. It also challenged the Tribunal’s reliance on the Supreme Court’s decision in *Sukhvinder Singh v. Union of...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File