P&H: Upholds Cheque-Dishonour Conviction, Rejects ‘Security Cheque’ Defence

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 02 Nov 2026
Headnotes

(i) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Ss.118, 138 and 139 — Dishonour of cheque — Once accused admitted his signatures on cheque, presumption u/s.118 could be raised in favour of complainant that cheque had been issued for consideration and in discharge of an existing debt or...

(ii) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.139 — Dishonour of cheque — Complainant financial capacity — Mere suggestion challenging financial competence of complainant is not sufficient to rebut presumption u/s.139 of Act, burden of which always remains upon accused. (Para 12)

(ii) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, S.138 — Dishonour of cheque — Statutory notice — Notice dispatched to accused at his correct address, where accused did not dispute residing, was to be assumed delivered — Accused’s failure to pay within stipulated period constituted an offence u/s.138...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Upholds Cheque-Dishonour Conviction, Rejects ‘Security Cheque’ Defence

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a criminal revision petition challenging a conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Justice Yashvir Singh Rathor held that the accused had not produced evidence to support his claim that the cheque was given only as security.

The complainant’s case was that he had lent the accused Rs 2 lakh in June 2018. When asked to repay the amount in September 2019, the accused allegedly issued a cheque for Rs 2 lakh.

The cheque was returned unpaid for insufficient funds. The complainant then sent a legal notice demanding payment, but...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File