P&H: Allows compensation claim in railway death case, says non-recovery of ticket cannot defeat bona fide passenger claim

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 17 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A — Untoward incident — Railways had not established any statutory exception such as suicide, attempted suicide, self-inflicted injury, criminal act, intoxication or insanity — Death of the deceased was held to have occurred as a result of an untoward...

(ii) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A — Bona fide passenger — Mere non-recovery of journey ticket could not by itself lead to conclusion that no ticket had been purchased, especially when old railway tickets and other articles were recovered from deceased and claim of purchase...

(iii) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A — Evidence — Tribunal ought not to have discarded sworn testimony of AW1 merely on the basis of an isolated statement attributed to him during DRM inquiry — Statement recorded subsequently during an internal DRM inquiry could not automatically...

(iv) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A — Evidence — Conclusion in DRM report that deceased was crossing railway line and was run over by train was itself inferential — There was no eyewitness account establishing that deceased was actually crossing railway line at relevant time...

(v) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A — Compensation — Railway was directed to pay compensation of Rs.4,00,000 with interest at 9% per annum from date of filing of the claim petition till the date of the order or Rs.8,00,000, whichever is higher — Delay in...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Allows compensation claim in railway death case, says non-recovery of ticket cannot defeat bona fide passenger claim

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed a compensation claim filed by the parents of a young man who died in a railway accident, holding that the mere non-recovery of a journey ticket cannot by itself prove that he was not a bona fide passenger.

The case arose from the death of Amar Singh, who, according to his parents, had travelled from Palwal Railway Station to buy books in Faridabad. They said he purchased a ticket, boarded a passenger train, and accidentally fell from the running train due to heavy rush. The Railway Claims Tribunal had rejected the claim,...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File