P&H: Refuses to condone 441-day delay in Income Tax appeal, says assessee showed no sufficient cause

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 23 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Income Tax Act, 1961, S.249(2), 249(3) — Appeal before CIT(A) — Condonation of delay — Expression “sufficient cause” is not to be construed pedantically, but applicant must explain what prevented him from approaching appellate authority within limitation and explanation must satisfy the test of...

(ii) Income Tax Act, 1961, S.249(3) — Condonation of delay — Inordinate delay due to ill-health — Where explanation covers only part of delay and there is no material such as medical certificate, prescription or hospital record to substantiate remaining period, bare and general plea...

(iii) Income Tax Act, 1961, S.249(3) — Condonation of delay — Negligence and inaction — Appellant own conduct at assessment stage is relevant and telling circumstances, as remained inactive and did not cooperate even at assessment stage, refused statutory notices and failed to produce books...

(iv) Income Tax Act, 1961, S.260-A — Substantial question of law — Concurrent findings on delay — Where CIT(A) and Tribunal concurrently find, on proper appreciation of facts, that no sufficient cause was made out for condonation of delay, such finding is one of fact...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Refuses to condone 441-day delay in Income Tax appeal, says assessee showed no sufficient cause

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed an income tax appeal filed by Rijwan, upholding the refusal to condone a delay of 441 days in filing the first appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). The Court said the assessee failed to show sufficient cause for the delay and that no substantial question of law arose in the matter.

The case arose from an assessment for the year 2014-15. The assessee, a dairy products trader, had declared income of Rs. 3,73,618, but the Assessing Officer completed a best-judgment assessment after notices went unanswered and books of account were...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File