P&H: Railway accident: Court awards Rs 8 lakh to mother of man who died after falling from train, says missing ticket not fatal to claim

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 18 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124A, Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, Ss.16, 23, Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2003, R.7(2) — Compensation — Untoward incident — Bona fide passenger — Mere non-recovery of journey ticket from deceased could not, by itself, lead...

(ii) Railways Act, 1989, Sections 123(c)(2) and 124-A — Compensation — Circumstantial evidence — Contemporaneous record, including death report, RPF model proforma, statements of Station Superintendent and other railway officials, and close time gap between departure of train and discovery of deceased on platform, established strong circumstantial link...

(iii) Railways Act, 1989, Ss.123(c)(2), 124-A, Railway Passengers (Manner of Investigation of Untoward Incidents) Rules, 2003, R.7(2)  — Compensation — Death due to falling from train — Railway authorities contention that deceased was travelling in disguise as eunuch could not be sustained -- In absence of independent corroboration...


Facts of the Case

P&H:  Railway accident: Court awards Rs 8 lakh to mother of man who died after falling from train, says missing ticket not fatal to claim

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has allowed an appeal filed by Rani, the mother of a deceased passenger, and set aside the Railway Claims Tribunal’s order rejecting her compensation claim. The case arose from the death of her son, Kawaljit Singh, who allegedly fell from train No. 12498, Shan-e-Punjab, on March 11, 2020.

Rani had claimed compensation under the Railway Claims Tribunal Act and the Railways Act, saying her son boarded the train from Amritsar for Jalandhar and accidentally fell near Beas Railway Station. The Railways opposed the claim, arguing that no ticket was recovered from the deceased and...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File