P&H: Will not proved, Refuses to Interfere in Second Appeal, Upholds Decree in Family Land Dispute

punjab-haryana
⚖️ Order Date: 18 Sep 2026
Headnotes

(i) Indian Evidence Act, 1872, Ss.68, 69 — Will — Proof of execution and attestation — Propounder of Will failed to produce original Will or any copy showing signatures or thumb impressions of testator and attesting witnesses — No attesting witness was examined, no death certificate of...

(ii) Mutation — Sanction on basis of unproved Will — Mutation sanctioned in favour of the defendant on the basis of the alleged Will was liable to be set aside when the Will itself was not proved in accordance with law. (Paras 12, 13 and 18)

(iii) Limitation — Suit for declaration challenging mutation — Plaintiffs pleaded that they came to know of mutation only on 25.08.2014 and filed the suit on 21.10.2014 — No evidence was led by appellant to show prior knowledge — Suit within limitation. (Para 17)

(iv) Specific Relief Act, 1963, S.38 — Suit for declaration and permanent injunction — Land was earlier owned by father, who died intestate, leaving behind his son, daughters and wife as legal heirs — In absence of proved Will, plaintiffs were entitled to declaration of joint ownership...


Facts of the Case

P&H: Will not proved, Refuses to Interfere in Second Appeal, Upholds Decree in Family Land Dispute

The Punjab and Haryana High Court has dismissed a regular second appeal filed by Paramjit Singh in a family property dispute involving agricultural land at Village Jalalwal, Jalandhar. The dispute was between the defendant and his three sisters, who claimed joint ownership over the land after the death of their father, Naranjan Singh.

The sisters had filed a suit seeking a declaration that they were joint owners in possession of the land to the extent of their respective shares. They also challenged Mutation No. 341, which had been sanctioned in favour of Paramjit Singh on the basis of an alleged...

Login required to open full judgment PDF
Login to Access File